![]() So especially for people who don't buy new, cutting edge cameras often, staying with an older version which still has a satisfying feature set is a very valid option, like for me who has been only using the E-M1 Mark I and the Pen-F for the last few years. I still say the most major improvement here is actually the X-Trans support, as it gives Fujifilm users, especially those using Windows computers, a new all-round RAW processing solution other than Capture One or Adobe. It also brings DeepPRIME to the table for Fujifilm RAW files, while I haven't tried the software in person, the also said to be very good Topaz Noise AI seems to be a hit and miss with Fuji RAW. To be honest, if it wouldn't be for the X-Trans support, I personally wouldn't even bother with PL 5 at all.įor Micro Four Thirds users what of course might be relevant down the road is support for the to-be-released cameras, like the GH6. However if you have no intentions buying one right away and rather wait, you might as well wait for the next iteration of PhotoLab, which might again bring more features. ![]() I also dislike DXO's policy regarding camera profiles, however they aren't the only ones doing that and it helps them selling new software. The only company I know of which is actually extremely generous in terms of updates is Serif: I paid for their original Windows version of Affinity Photo once a few years ago and still get new updates, supported cameras and profiles absolutely free of charge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |